The Pointer Go-to-Market Index · Quarterly Edition
More GTM ads, fewer of the seats tech revenue teams hire for.
Q1 FY27 ANZ GTM Hiring Review (calendar Q3 2026). Thirteen weekly readings, weeks ending 5 July to 27 Sept 2026.
+7.2%
New GTM ads per week against last quarter (5,066 a week)
$100,000
Median advertised base, unchanged on 8,782 disclosed ads
25.9%
of GTM ads mention AI, level with last quarter (25.5%)
1 in 2
Ads from the 100 biggest hirers that copy another of their ads
The Pointer Go-to-Market Index · Quarterly Edition
More GTM ads, fewer of the seats tech revenue teams hire for.
The Pointer Index: Q1 FY27 ANZ GTM Hiring Review, the first quarter of the Australian financial year (calendar Q3 2026). Thirteen weekly readings, weeks ending 5 July to 27 Sept 2026, and the 100 employers behind the most ads.
+7.2%
New GTM ads per week against last quarter (5,066 a week)
$100,000
Median advertised base, unchanged on 8,782 disclosed ads
25.9%
of GTM ads mention AI, level with last quarter (25.5%)
1 in 2
Ads from the 100 biggest hirers that copy another of their ads
Compiled by Ricky Pearl
Founder, Pointer Strategy · 20+ years as a sales leader across Australia and New Zealand
Executive summary
Five signals for revenue leaders
- 1.Demand rose. ANZ employers opened 5,066 direct GTM ads a week in Q1 FY27, up 7.2% on Q4 FY26's 4,726, and every week sat between 4,317 and 5,506.
- 2.Pay did not reprice. The median advertised base was $100,000 on 8,782 disclosed ads, the same as last quarter, with the middle half of the market between $82,500 and $125,000.
- 3.The growth was not in tech sales seats. Account executive ads fell 12% a week, account manager ads 6% and customer success 9%, while marketing rose 15% and relationship-manager and banking titles 60%.
- 4.Big hirers post the same job many times. The 100 biggest GTM hirers ran 10,529 ads for 5,464 unique ads, so about one in two was a copy. The four major banks were up 46% and the three big telcos down 38%.
- 5.AI demand held steady and stayed out of front-line Sales. About one GTM ad in four mentions AI (25.9%, against 25.5% last quarter). In Sales it is 20.9%, against 21.4%.
01 · Demand
Employers opened more GTM ads, every week of the quarter
The cleanest read on demand is the number of new ads employers open each week: an ad is counted in the week we first see it, and that week is fixed once we capture the ad. In Q1 FY27 direct employers opened 65,855 GTM ads, 5,066 a week against 4,726 a week in Q4 FY26, a rise of 7.2%. No week fell below 4,317 or rose above 5,506. Most of the lift came in July, the first weeks of the financial year, at 5,418 new ads a week. August and September eased to 4,873 a week, still above last quarter's 4,720 on the same weekly snapshots.
We checked whether the rise came from how we collect rather than from employers. LinkedIn, SEEK and careers sites contributed a similar share of new ads in both quarters, and our last recorded change to the LinkedIn and SEEK searches was in late April: measured against May and June alone (4,736 a week), the rise is the same. LinkedIn and SEEK grew; careers sites were flat.
The second chart is the count past editions called active roles. Until 4 October every ad was closed seven days after we last saw it, so this number tracked recent advertising, not the number of ads still live, and it fell from 7,029 in the week ending 12 July to 5,371 at the close while new ads were rising. We publish it as recorded and do not read it as demand. Closures and days on market are left out for the same reason; they return once we hold a full quarter of verified end dates.
02 · Pay
Pay did not reprice
This is the one place we test whether pay moved, because a quarter of disclosed ads is large enough to show it. It did not. The median advertised base was $100,000 across 8,782 ads that stated pay, against $100,000 on 7,061 last quarter. The 25th percentile moved from $81,999 to $82,500 and the 75th stayed at $125,000. More demand did not push up advertised bands.
| Function | Q4 FY26 median | n | Q1 FY27 median | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All GTM | $100,000 | 7,061 | $100,000 | 8,782 |
| Sales | $100,000 | 3,587 | $100,000 | 4,269 |
| Marketing | $95,000 | 1,858 | $94,713 | 2,493 |
| Account Management | $100,000 | 760 | $100,000 | 827 |
| Customer Success | $100,000 | 284 | $100,000 | 374 |
| Presales | $120,000 | 110 | $143,000 | 109 |
| Partnerships | $120,000 | 231 | $115,000 | 271 |
| Growth | $115,000 | 107 | $111,000 | 238 |
| RevOps* | $102,500 | 60 | $92,500 | 154 |
Median of the midpoint of disclosed advertised AUD bands, ads first seen in each quarter. * Fewer than 100 disclosed ads in at least one quarter: directional. Functions under 30 in either quarter are not shown.
Sales, Account Management and Customer Success sat on the same $100,000 median in both quarters, on samples large enough to trust. The bigger swings in the table, such as Presales, come from functions where only about a hundred ads a quarter state pay, and they read as sample noise rather than repricing. Disclosure itself stayed a minority habit: between 13.8% and 16.8% of GTM ads stated pay in any week.
The median is a headline, not a hiring plan. Below is the per-role breakdown, junior to senior, frozen at quarter close. Base is a published ANZ guide anchor adjusted by disclosed salaries in live ANZ ads at a capped weight, plus community submissions; each row states the listing count behind it. OTE is a curated guide estimate that takes no listing input, because the top of an advertised band is not on-target earnings.
Sales
Business Development Representative
Entry Level
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 2 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
6-12 Months of Experience
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 2 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Account Executive
SMB
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 6 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Mid Market / Commercial
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 6 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Enterprise
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 6 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Account Manager
Commercial
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1,976 disclosed listing salaries and 2 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Business Development Manager
Commercial
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Sales Leadership
BDR Manager
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 2 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Sales Manager
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1,150 disclosed listing salaries and 2 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Director of Sales *
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 73 disclosed listing salaries.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Head of Sales / VP Sales *
Head of Sales
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 268 disclosed listing salaries and 2 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
VP Sales / CRO
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 2 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Account Management
Account Manager
Commercial
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1,976 disclosed listing salaries.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Key Accounts
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 321 disclosed listing salaries.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
National / Enterprise Accounts
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 321 disclosed listing salaries.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Customer Success
Customer Success Manager
CSM SMB-Mid
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 530 disclosed listing salaries and 3 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Mid-Enterprise Market
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 3 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Head of Customer Success *
Director
Base — Guide estimate. No listing or submission input.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Head of / VP
Base — Guide estimate. No listing or submission input.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Marketing
Marketing Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1,784 disclosed listing salaries and 2 community submissions.
Digital Marketing Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1,153 disclosed listing salaries.
Growth Marketing Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1,153 disclosed listing salaries.
Product Marketing Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 36 disclosed listing salaries.
CRM / Lifecycle Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 1,153 disclosed listing salaries.
Content Marketing Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 2,108 disclosed listing salaries.
Brand Marketing Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 262 disclosed listing salaries.
Marketing Director *
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 18 disclosed listing salaries.
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Head of Marketing / VP Marketing *
Head of / VP
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 217 disclosed listing salaries and 1 community submissions.
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Partnerships
Partnerships Associate / Analyst
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 84 disclosed listing salaries and 8 community submissions.
OTE — Curated guide estimate. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Partnerships Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 380 disclosed listing salaries and 56 community submissions.
OTE — Guide estimate adjusted by 56 community submissions. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Senior Partnerships Manager
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 151 disclosed listing salaries and 70 community submissions.
OTE — Guide estimate adjusted by 70 community submissions. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
Director of Partnerships *
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 29 community submissions.
OTE — Guide estimate adjusted by 29 community submissions. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
VP / Head of Partnerships *
General
Base — Guide-anchored blend of published ANZ guide ranges and 39 disclosed listing salaries and 33 community submissions.
OTE — Guide estimate adjusted by 33 community submissions. No listing input: advertised pay bands are not on-target earnings.
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
03 · Who is hiring
The 100 employers behind the most GTM ads
Many "who's hiring" lists start with companies the author has heard of. These start from the ads: every direct-employer GTM ad in Australia and New Zealand over the 90 days to 22 Sept, counted twice, once as posted and once with the copies removed. The same ad goes up once per city on LinkedIn, again on SEEK, again on the careers site and again when it is refreshed. Across the market, 62,163 ads came down to 45,864 unique ads from 17,246 employers, so 26% were copies.
The copy rate climbs with size. At the 100 biggest hirers it is 48%: their 10,529 ads were 5,464 unique ads. Stryker posted 384 ads for 73 unique ones. Amazon, including AWS, posted 653 for 334. Salesforce posted 264 for 82. Size a competitor from a job feed and you can be out by a factor of five. Even so, the 100 biggest hirers hold only 11.9% of unique ads. The rest of the market is spread across seventeen thousand employers.
10,529 → 5,464
Ads posted by the 100 biggest ANZ GTM hirers, and what is left once the copies are removed.
The lists rank on unique ads: distinct requisition links where we have the employer's careers site, otherwise distinct posting weeks per title. A unique ad is still not a headcount. It might be filling one seat or six, and the ad does not say. Recruiters are excluded and the top of each list was checked by hand.
The 100 biggest tech GTM hirers
Tech here means software, internet platforms, cloud and infrastructure, cybersecurity, IT services and resellers, payments infrastructure and the telcos. Employers our company data flags as tech posted 10,346 unique GTM ads this quarter, from 2,650 companies; that flag is rougher than the definition above, so read it as the size of the sector, not of this table. The 100 below, checked by hand, posted 3,200 unique ads from 6,232. Amazon (including AWS), Check Point, Palo Alto Networks and the distributors Dicker Data and Tech Data were up on last quarter; Salesforce, Databricks, Snowflake and SAP were down.
Ranked by unique ads, 90 days to 22 September
| # | Employer | Unique ads | Total ads | vs prior qtr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon (incl. AWS) | 334 | 653 | +45% |
| 2 | Microsoft | 108 | 194 | +19% |
| 3 | 102 | 267 | +26% | |
| 4 | CoStar | 100 | 129 | +89% |
| 5 | Salesforce | 82 | 264 | −26% |
| 6 | DoorDash | 65 | 118 | +75% |
| 7 | Cisco | 62 | 152 | +38% |
| 8 | Halter | 60 | 94 | +19% |
| 9 | Xero | 56 | 104 | +21% |
| 10 | carsales | 54 | 148 | +129% |
| 11 | Telstra | 53 | 106 | −39% |
| 12 | Martian Logic | 51 | 89 | −4% |
| 13 | Accenture | 50 | 77 | +35% |
| 14 | Datacom | 48 | 130 | −57% |
| 15 | DXC Technology | 45 | 67 | 0% |
| 16 | Uber | 43 | 54 | −7% |
| 17 | Check Point Software | 42 | 99 | +133% |
| 18 | Vocus | 41 | 89 | −24% |
| 19 | LexisNexis | 41 | 55 | +7% |
| 20 | Domain | 39 | 61 | +24% |
| 21 | ServiceNow | 38 | 89 | +9% |
| 22 | Palo Alto Networks | 38 | 81 | +61% |
| 23 | Optus | 37 | 48 | −46% |
| 24 | Nearmap | 36 | 137 | +300% |
| 25 | SoftwareONE | 36 | 53 | +129% |
Show ranks 26 to 100
| 26 | REA Group | 34 | 102 | +89% |
| 27 | Resonate CX | 34 | 97 | +44% |
| 28 | Square (Block) | 34 | 66 | −18% |
| 29 | Fever | 33 | 58 | −33% |
| 30 | Mastercard | 32 | 67 | +29% |
| 31 | TikTok | 32 | 44 | +42% |
| 32 | Stripe | 31 | 67 | −31% |
| 33 | GitLab | 31 | 37 | −11% |
| 34 | Easygo | 29 | 47 | −5% |
| 35 | Databricks | 29 | 40 | −44% |
| 36 | Canva | 27 | 71 | −27% |
| 37 | Tyro | 27 | 67 | +20% |
| 38 | Oracle | 27 | 60 | +140% |
| 39 | Data#3 | 27 | 32 | −14% |
| 40 | Odoo | 26 | 27 | +10% |
| 41 | Cloudflare | 25 | 30 | +17% |
| 42 | Airwallex | 24 | 71 | −41% |
| 43 | EatClub | 24 | 54 | −3% |
| 44 | Pax8 | 24 | 51 | +7% |
| 45 | MYOB | 24 | 48 | −11% |
| 46 | Podium | 23 | 37 | +36% |
| 47 | TechnologyOne | 23 | 28 | +127% |
| 48 | Dicker Data | 23 | 23 | +192% |
| 49 | Fusion5 | 22 | 43 | +50% |
| 50 | Too Good To Go | 22 | 41 | +9% |
| 51 | Sitemate | 22 | 40 | +96% |
| 52 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 22 | 35 | −42% |
| 53 | Netskope | 22 | 28 | +96% |
| 54 | Heidi Health | 21 | 46 | +17% |
| 55 | One New Zealand | 21 | 39 | +133% |
| 56 | Diligent | 21 | 32 | −25% |
| 57 | UpGuard | 20 | 86 | +48% |
| 58 | Workday | 20 | 44 | −11% |
| 59 | Exclusive Networks | 20 | 35 | −29% |
| 60 | World Wide Technology | 20 | 23 | +48% |
| 61 | NetApp | 19 | 60 | −1% |
| 62 | Atlassian | 19 | 60 | −16% |
| 63 | CrowdStrike | 19 | 52 | −20% |
| 64 | AvePoint | 19 | 38 | +21% |
| 65 | HubSpot | 19 | 37 | −1% |
| 66 | SAP | 19 | 29 | −69% |
| 67 | Compass Education | 18 | 41 | +23% |
| 68 | Atturra | 18 | 32 | +167% |
| 69 | NCS | 18 | 21 | −36% |
| 70 | Tech Data | 18 | 18 | +167% |
| 71 | Fujitsu | 17 | 35 | +8% |
| 72 | Agilitus | 17 | 30 | −53% |
| 73 | Snowflake | 17 | 25 | −53% |
| 74 | ELMO Software | 17 | 18 | +16% |
| 75 | Aussie Broadband | 16 | 32 | −25% |
| 76 | 16 | 32 | +184% | |
| 77 | Ebury | 16 | 30 | +58% |
| 78 | CORTO | 16 | 28 | +58% |
| 79 | FICO | 16 | 27 | +42% |
| 80 | IBM | 16 | 22 | −60% |
| 81 | HungryPanda | 16 | 19 | +184% |
| 82 | TPG Telecom | 16 | 17 | −11% |
| 83 | UKG | 15 | 38 | +48% |
| 84 | First Focus | 15 | 33 | −17% |
| 85 | Experian | 15 | 32 | −42% |
| 86 | NinjaOne | 15 | 30 | +33% |
| 87 | Mable | 15 | 28 | +90% |
| 88 | OpenText | 15 | 27 | −30% |
| 89 | Sage | 15 | 17 | +344% |
| 90 | KPay | 15 | 15 | −11% |
| 91 | Humanforce | 15 | 15 | −26% |
| 92 | SS&C Technologies | 14 | 36 | +13% |
| 93 | MRI Software | 14 | 32 | +4% |
| 94 | Okta | 14 | 29 | −4% |
| 95 | Nexon | 14 | 27 | +56% |
| 96 | Ideagen | 14 | 23 | +38% |
| 97 | Visa | 14 | 21 | −57% |
| 98 | InfoTrack | 14 | 20 | +522% |
| 99 | Legora | 14 | 18 | +522% |
| 100 | Avanade | 14 | 14 | +149% |
The 100 biggest GTM hirers, all industries
Take the industry filter off and the list changes character. The four major banks (ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB) posted 463 unique ads against 317 last quarter, up 46%, mostly relationship and small-business banking roles. The three big telcos (Telstra, Optus, Vocus) went the other way, 131 against 210, down 38%.
Ranked by unique ads, 90 days to 22 September
| # | Employer | Unique ads | Total ads | vs prior qtr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon (incl. AWS) | 334 | 653 | +45% |
| 2 | ANZ | 157 | 253 | +50% |
| 3 | Flight Centre | 129 | 196 | +1% |
| 4 | Commonwealth Bank | 124 | 238 | +33% |
| 5 | Westpac | 113 | 201 | +70% |
| 6 | Marsh | 109 | 249 | +18% |
| 7 | Microsoft | 108 | 194 | +19% |
| 8 | Publicis Groupe | 105 | 151 | +24% |
| 9 | 102 | 267 | +26% | |
| 10 | CoStar | 100 | 129 | +89% |
| 11 | Bapcor | 83 | 177 | +64% |
| 12 | Asahi Beverages | 83 | 152 | +34% |
| 13 | Salesforce | 82 | 264 | −26% |
| 14 | Genuine Parts (Repco) | 76 | 78 | −5% |
| 15 | Woolworths Group | 75 | 82 | +17% |
| 16 | Stryker | 73 | 384 | +25% |
| 17 | Johnson & Johnson | 70 | 168 | −6% |
| 18 | DuluxGroup | 70 | 117 | +5% |
| 19 | NAB | 69 | 166 | +30% |
| 20 | Southern Cross Austereo | 65 | 120 | −28% |
| 21 | DoorDash | 65 | 118 | +75% |
| 22 | Gallagher | 64 | 148 | +35% |
| 23 | Cotton On Group | 64 | 99 | +67% |
| 24 | Accor | 64 | 85 | −7% |
| 25 | Cisco | 62 | 152 | +38% |
Show ranks 26 to 100
| 26 | News Corp Australia | 62 | 132 | +38% |
| 27 | Halter | 60 | 94 | +19% |
| 28 | Aon | 58 | 134 | −1% |
| 29 | Xero | 56 | 104 | +21% |
| 30 | carsales | 54 | 148 | +129% |
| 31 | Telstra | 53 | 106 | −39% |
| 32 | Nine | 53 | 78 | +105% |
| 33 | Bayer | 52 | 83 | +362% |
| 34 | Wurth Australia | 52 | 55 | +44% |
| 35 | Martian Logic | 51 | 89 | −4% |
| 36 | Schneider Electric | 50 | 145 | +8% |
| 37 | Accenture | 50 | 77 | +35% |
| 38 | TMGM | 49 | 102 | +118% |
| 39 | Coca-Cola Europacific | 49 | 86 | −11% |
| 40 | Omnicom Media Group | 49 | 53 | −5% |
| 41 | Datacom | 48 | 130 | −57% |
| 42 | ARN | 48 | 107 | +4% |
| 43 | EVT Group | 47 | 55 | +23% |
| 44 | ZURU | 47 | 55 | +55% |
| 45 | DXC Technology | 45 | 67 | 0% |
| 46 | TransPerfect Connect | 44 | 165 | +389% |
| 47 | RELX | 44 | 69 | +179% |
| 48 | Uber | 43 | 54 | −7% |
| 49 | Arthrex | 42 | 109 | +10% |
| 50 | Check Point Software | 42 | 99 | +133% |
| 51 | Motion Asia Pacific | 42 | 74 | −27% |
| 52 | Metcash | 41 | 141 | −17% |
| 53 | Vocus | 41 | 89 | −24% |
| 54 | Arrotex Pharmaceuticals | 41 | 79 | +30% |
| 55 | Accent Group Careers | 41 | 60 | +4% |
| 56 | LexisNexis | 41 | 55 | +7% |
| 57 | Rexel | 40 | 85 | −21% |
| 58 | Stan | 40 | 42 | +15% |
| 59 | Thryv | 39 | 93 | −17% |
| 60 | Nestlé | 39 | 71 | −11% |
| 61 | Domain | 39 | 61 | +24% |
| 62 | ServiceNow | 38 | 89 | +9% |
| 63 | PFD Food Services | 38 | 83 | +41% |
| 64 | Palo Alto Networks | 38 | 81 | +61% |
| 65 | Qantas | 38 | 70 | +88% |
| 66 | Colliers | 38 | 63 | −1% |
| 67 | dentsu | 38 | 60 | +2% |
| 68 | Strikeforce AMC | 38 | 59 | +78% |
| 69 | WPP Media | 37 | 62 | −41% |
| 70 | Optus | 37 | 48 | −46% |
| 71 | Nearmap | 36 | 137 | +300% |
| 72 | Medtronic | 36 | 87 | +10% |
| 73 | SoftwareONE | 36 | 53 | +129% |
| 74 | Havas Group | 36 | 43 | +10% |
| 75 | Mars | 35 | 73 | +24% |
| 76 | Bunzl Australasia | 35 | 63 | −43% |
| 77 | PepsiCo | 35 | 57 | −8% |
| 78 | NSW Government departments | 35 | 45 | −8% |
| 79 | REA Group | 34 | 102 | +89% |
| 80 | Resonate CX | 34 | 97 | +44% |
| 81 | Square (Block) | 34 | 66 | −18% |
| 82 | Marriott | 34 | 45 | −16% |
| 83 | Creative Activation | 33 | 60 | −32% |
| 84 | Fever | 33 | 58 | −33% |
| 85 | Bidfood Australia | 33 | 53 | +40% |
| 86 | Red Bull | 33 | 47 | +1% |
| 87 | Geely Auto Australia | 33 | 45 | +226% |
| 88 | Mastercard | 32 | 67 | +29% |
| 89 | American Express | 32 | 62 | +119% |
| 90 | PPG Industries | 32 | 60 | +78% |
| 91 | Arnott's | 32 | 47 | +29% |
| 92 | TikTok | 32 | 44 | +42% |
| 93 | Stripe | 31 | 67 | −31% |
| 94 | Spark Foundry Australia | 31 | 50 | +2% |
| 95 | Techtronic Industries | 31 | 46 | −5% |
| 96 | GitLab | 31 | 37 | −11% |
| 97 | GE HealthCare | 30 | 58 | +3% |
| 98 | Travel + Leisure Co | 29 | 57 | +29% |
| 99 | DKSH | 29 | 54 | +17% |
| 100 | Easygo | 29 | 47 | −5% |
vs prior qtr compares unique ads with the 80 days from 6 April, scaled to 90 days. First published in The Pointer Index, Issue 24.
See which companies are hiring now04 · Where the growth went
More ads, fewer of the classic tech sales seats
The quarter added about 340 GTM ads a week. Read by job title, which never changes after we capture an ad, very little of that landed in the seats a software revenue team hires for. Account executive ads fell from 223 a week to 197, account manager and key account ads from 496 to 468, and customer success from 106 to 96. Together that is 64 fewer ads a week in the three seats. SDR and BDR ads (105 a week) and presales (138) were flat.
The growth went to marketing, up from 864 to 992 ads a week, to relationship-manager and banking titles, up from 57 to 90 (about 30% of them at banks), and to business development managers, up from 399 to 425. GTM demand grew this quarter. The account executive seat, the core of software new-business selling, did not.
| Job title family | Q4 FY26 / wk | Q1 FY27 / wk | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDR / BDR | 104 | 105 | +1% |
| Account Executive | 223 | 197 | −12% |
| Business Development Manager | 399 | 425 | +7% |
| Banking and relationship managers | 57 | 90 | +60% |
| Account Manager / KAM | 496 | 468 | −6% |
| Customer Success | 106 | 96 | −9% |
| Presales / Solutions | 138 | 138 | +0% |
| RevOps / Sales Ops | 21 | 21 | −2% |
| Partnerships / Channel | 194 | 195 | +1% |
| Enablement | 22 | 14 | −36% |
| Marketing | 864 | 992 | +15% |
| Everything else | 2,103 | 2,323 | +11% |
New direct-employer GTM ads per week, grouped by words in the job title (first match wins). "Everything else" holds titles such as sales representative, product specialist and branch manager.
Leadership titles (head of, director, VP, chief, general manager) were 6.0% of new ads against 5.5% last quarter, a small move. Our function totals, below, are set by a classifier that we keep refining. Where they disagree with the titles, as with Growth and RevOps, the titles are the better guide.
| Function (classifier) | Q4 FY26 / wk | Q1 FY27 / wk | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2,094 | 2,148 | +3% |
| Marketing | 1,076 | 1,198 | +11% |
| Account Management | 718 | 735 | +2% |
| Customer Success | 239 | 256 | +7% |
| Presales | 188 | 198 | +5% |
| Partnerships | 165 | 196 | +19% |
| Growth | 73 | 137 | +87% |
| RevOps | 84 | 112 | +33% |
| Product Marketing | 27 | 38 | +43% |
| Enablement | 46 | 35 | −24% |
| GTM Engineering | 17 | 13 | −20% |
05 · AI
AI demand held at one ad in four, and stayed out of front-line Sales
25.9% of the 41,210 LinkedIn and careers-site GTM ads first seen this quarter mention AI, against 25.5% last quarter on the same detector. That is no real change. By function the picture is the same: Presales 51.4% to 53.8%, Customer Success 44.8% to 45.4%, Marketing 25.7% to 26.1%.
Front-line Sales did not move either, 21.4% to 20.9%. Last quarter we said the tell to watch was whether AI spread from the technical layer into Sales. It has not. AI language sits in the ads for the roles around the seller, not the seller's own.
Correction to the Q4 FY26 edition
Last quarter's AI figures included SEEK ads, whose text we captured only in part until mid-August. A shortened ad has fewer chances to mention AI, so those figures understated AI demand. On all ads, this quarter's rate would read 17.8% to 19.9%, a rise that comes entirely from SEEK (5.0% to 9.8%) as its full text came back. From this edition we measure AI on LinkedIn and careers-site ads only. The Q4 FY26 report is left as published.
20.9%
of front-line Sales ads mention AI, against 53.8% in Presales and 45.4% in Customer Success.
By seniority the line sits at senior level. Entry and mid-level ads mention AI 21.4% and 21.3% of the time; senior, lead and director ads 34.7%, 37.6% and 32.8%. VP and C-level ads read higher still, on small samples.
AI mention rate by seniority
LinkedIn and careers-site GTM ads, Q1 FY27
06 · Geography
Sydney advertises more pay and more AI
Sydney carried 1,630 new GTM ads a week to Melbourne's 971. It advertised a median base of $105,000 against $98,675 in Melbourne and $97,977 in Perth, and 35.5% of its LinkedIn and careers-site ads mention AI, against 29.6% in Melbourne and 15.9% in Perth. Brisbane and Perth are sales towns: Sales is 49.6% and 53.4% of their GTM ads, against 37.0% in Sydney.
| City | Ads / wk | Median base | AI rate | Sales | Marketing | Acct Mgmt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sydney | 1,630 | $105,000 | 35.5% | 37.0% | 24.3% | 13.6% |
| Melbourne | 971 | $98,675 | 29.6% | 40.1% | 25.8% | 13.8% |
| Brisbane | 418 | $100,000 | 21.0% | 49.6% | 19.9% | 14.2% |
| Perth | 270 | $97,977 | 15.9% | 53.4% | 18.9% | 15.0% |
| Auckland | 180 | $104,000 NZD | 23.3% | 32.0% | 29.2% | 18.1% |
| Adelaide | 148 | $90,000 | 17.2% | 48.2% | 21.9% | 17.3% |
| Canberra | 54 | $102,500 | 35.2% | 47.2% | 16.9% | 14.4% |
| Wellington | 23 | n/a | 29.5% | 38.0% | 15.1% | 23.6% |
New direct-employer GTM ads first seen in Q1 FY27. Median base is the midpoint of disclosed bands, AUD for Australian cities and NZD for New Zealand; suppressed under 30 disclosed ads. AI rate is measured on LinkedIn and careers-site ads only.
07 · Last quarter's calls
What we said Q1 would answer
The Q4 FY26 edition set four things to watch. Here is how each landed.
Active GTM roles: wrong measure
We set thresholds of 7,000 and 5,500 on the active count. It touched 7,029 in July and closed at 5,371, which on our own rule would read as a smaller market. It was not: new ads rose 7.2%. The count measured our seven-day window rather than the market, which is why we have replaced it with verified end dates. New ads per week is the demand measure from here.
The technical and ops layer: steadied, CS still easing
Presales ads held at 138 a week by title. Customer success eased again, down 9%. The layer stopped shrinking in the technical seats and kept thinning in the post-sale ones.
AI mention rate: already at 25%, flat, not spreading into Sales
We called 25% the point where AI becomes a baseline expectation. Measured on full ad text it was already there: 25.5% last quarter and 25.9% this quarter. The lower figure we published was held down by shortened SEEK ads (see the correction in section 05). It did not spread into front-line Sales (20.9%).
The $100,000 median: held
$100,000 on 8,782 disclosed ads. Pay bands have not repriced in two quarters.
08 · Forward
Four things Q2 FY27 will answer
New ads per week
Q1 FY27 ran at 5,066 a week. Hold above 4,726, last quarter's rate, through October and November and the July lift was a new level, not a new-financial-year bump. Fall back under it and it was the bump. LinkedIn collection changed provider in late September, so we will read this allowing for a small coverage change.
Account executive ads
197 a week, down from 223. A return above 223 is the first sign of tech new-logo hiring coming back. Another fall says software revenue teams are still hiring for the base, not for growth.
AI in front-line Sales
20.9% today, against 25.9% across GTM. When Sales reaches the market rate, AI language has reached the quota-carrying seat.
The live market, measured properly
From October a LinkedIn or careers-site ad stays counted until Fantastic Jobs reports it gone, a SEEK ad until SEEK's own end date, and an ad no one tracks until 30 days after we last see it. The first reading, for the week ending 4 Oct, counted 19,319 live direct GTM ads, 3.6 times the last seven-day figure. It was taken during the changeover, so treat it as a first estimate. Q2 FY27 is the first quarter on that basis, and closures and days on market return with it.
09 · So what
What to do with this
If you are a CRO or revenue leader
The seats you hire for are the quiet part of a busier market. Account executive, account manager and customer success ads all fell while total GTM ads rose, so fewer comparable ads are competing for those candidates than last quarter, and pay bands have not moved in two quarters. The competition is in marketing and in the banks' relationship teams. If you are planning FY27 headcount, budget on $100,000 for the median seat, not on a market that is running away from you.
If you are sizing a competitor
Count unique ads, not ads. At the biggest hirers half of what you see in a job feed is a copy, and the ratio runs from almost none to more than five times depending on how the employer posts.
If you are a candidate
There are more GTM ads than last quarter, but fewer of them are tech closing roles. If you sell software, expect to compete for fewer ads, and expect relationship, partner and marketing roles to be where the volume is. AI comes up in about one in three senior and lead ads; if you have it, put it on the CV. Sydney still advertises the premium, $105,000 median base against $98,675 in Melbourne.
Appendix
Methodology and caveats
The Pointer Index tracks GTM job ads across Australia and New Zealand, collected daily from LinkedIn, SEEK and company careers sites. Each ad is classified by function, role and seniority by a large language model and only genuine go-to-market roles are kept. Recruitment agency ads are excluded throughout. GTM means Sales, Account Management, Marketing, Customer Success, Presales, RevOps, Enablement, Partnerships, Growth, Product Marketing and GTM Engineering.
Quarter figures in this edition count ads by the week we first saw them, which is fixed when we capture the ad. Counts can still shift slightly as ads are reclassified or flagged as agency ads later. Q1 FY27 is the thirteen weeks from 29 June to 27 September 2026; it is compared with the twelve weeks from 6 April to 28 June as a weekly rate, leaving out the first tracked week, which contains the backfill of everything already live. Weekly series are the insert-only snapshots taken each Sunday, published as recorded.
Pay figures are medians of the midpoint of disclosed advertised bands. What an ad states may be base, OTE-inclusive or package-inclusive. AI figures come from a detector that scans the full ad text for AI language; it measures the ad, not the role. AI rates use LinkedIn and careers-site ads only, because SEEK ad text was cut short until mid-August and its rate moved with text length, not the market. If a number is wrong we correct it openly in the next edition and never restate a past one silently.
Caveats for this edition
- ·The weekly 'advertised' count is the number of GTM ads seen in the previous seven days. Until 4 October 2026 every ad was closed seven days after we last saw it, so this count tracks recent advertising, not the number of ads still live. It is published as recorded and not restated.
- ·Closures, openings against closures and days on market are not reported for this quarter. They return once a full quarter of verified end dates exists.
- ·Weekly openings are new direct-employer GTM ads first seen that week, including reposts. The quarter-on-quarter comparison is a weekly rate: Q3 has 13 weeks, Q2 has 12 (the backfill week ending 5 April is excluded).
- ·Function totals come from a classifier that is refined over time, so every function claim in this report is cross-checked against job titles, which never change after we capture them.
- ·AI mention rates are measured on LinkedIn and careers-site ads only, with the same detector in both quarters. SEEK ad text was truncated until mid-August, so SEEK's rate moved with text length rather than the market. They measure the language of the ad, not the substance of the role.
- ·Quarter counts are fixed to the week we first saw each ad, but can still shift slightly as ads are reclassified or flagged as agency ads after they arrive.
- ·Pay figures are medians of the midpoint of disclosed advertised bands, AUD only (NZD for New Zealand cities). Cells under 30 disclosed ads are suppressed and 30 to 99 are treated as directional.
- ·Employer lists cover the 90 days to 22 September and rank on unique ads (distinct careers-site requisition links where we have them, otherwise distinct posting weeks per title). A unique ad is not a headcount. Recruiters are excluded and the top of each list was checked by hand.
- ·Agency share is not trended: the agency flag improves over time, so the stored weekly series mixes detection vintages.
- ·From the week ending 4 October (W40) LinkedIn and careers-site ads close when Fantastic Jobs reports them gone, SEEK ads at SEEK's own end date, and untracked ads 30 days after we last see them. LinkedIn is collected through Fantastic Jobs from 25 September. Live counts from Q2 FY27 are not comparable with this report's seven-day counts.
Appendix
The index: thirteen readings
| Week ending | New ads | Seen in last 7 days | Median base | Transp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 July | 5,473 | 6,310 | $97,500 | 14.2% |
| 12 July | 5,333 | 7,029 | $100,000 | 15.8% |
| 19 July | 5,506 | 6,234 | $102,500 | 14.5% |
| 26 July | 5,360 | 6,181 | $100,000 | 13.8% |
| 2 Aug | 4,317 | 6,200 | $100,000 | 16.8% |
| 9 Aug | 5,145 | 5,882 | $100,000 | 15.0% |
| 16 Aug | 4,912 | 5,673 | $99,500 | 14.3% |
| 23 Aug | 5,141 | 5,846 | $100,000 | 15.4% |
| 30 Aug | 5,001 | 5,707 | $100,000 | 16.1% |
| 6 Sept | 5,109 | 5,779 | $99,730 | 15.8% |
| 13 Sept | 4,809 | 6,678 | $96,500 | 16.3% |
| 20 Sept | 4,786 | 6,411 | $100,000 | 16.1% |
| 27 Sept | 4,636 | 5,371 | $100,000 | 15.0% |
Weekly snapshot values as recorded. New ads here are counted at snapshot time; the quarter totals above are recounted on the same first-seen basis and can differ slightly because ads are classified after they arrive.
For press
Citation and republication
All figures may be cited with attribution to The Pointer Index, Q1 FY27 (calendar Q3 2026), Pointer Strategy. Charts and tables may be reproduced with a link back to this page. For the underlying data, a methodology question or a custom cut, contact Ricky Pearl at Pointer Strategy.
Published by Pointer Strategy · Q1 FY27 · Methodology based on thirteen weekly point-in-time snapshots and quarter counts of new direct-employer GTM ads by first-seen date, title-family cross-checks on function trends, disclosed advertised pay bands, role-level base-pay benchmarks anchored on published ANZ salary guides (OTE rows are guide estimates, not listing-derived), and employer rankings on unique ads. Cite with attribution.
Share this report: https://pointerstrategy.com/market-data/trends/q3-2026