The Pointer Go-to-Market Index · Quarterly Special Edition
ANZ go-to-market hiring spent Q4 closing more roles than it opened.
Q4 FY26 ANZ GTM Hiring Review (calendar Q2 2026). Thirteen weekly readings, 30 Mar to 28 June 2026.
$100,000
Median advertised base across ANZ go-to-market
−37%
Peak-to-trough fall in active GTM roles
17.1%
of GTM roles mention AI, led by Presales at 51.3%
8.7%
Agency-fronted share at its mid-June peak
The Pointer Go-to-Market Index · Quarterly Special Edition
ANZ go-to-market hiring spent Q4 closing more roles than it opened.
The Pointer Index: Q4 FY26 ANZ GTM Hiring Review, the final quarter of the Australian financial year (calendar Q2 2026). Thirteen weekly readings, weeks ending 30 Mar to 28 June 2026.
$100,000
Median advertised base across ANZ go-to-market
−37%
Peak-to-trough fall in active GTM roles
17.1%
of GTM roles now mention AI, led by Presales at 51.3%
8.7%
Agency-fronted share at its mid-June peak
Compiled by Ricky Pearl
Founder, Pointer Strategy · 20+ years as a sales leader across Australia and New Zealand
Executive summary
Five signals for revenue leaders
- 1.ANZ go-to-market hiring contracted for most of the quarter: openings trailed closures in 9 of 12 weeks, bottoming at 4,856 active roles in the week ending 24 May.
- 2.Advertised pay bands held while volume fell: the median advertised base sat at $100,000 with the 25th percentile drifting up from $80,000 to $81,999.
- 3.The cuts were uneven: Sales held its share of demand (roughly 44 to 47 percent all quarter) while the technical and ops layer (Presales, RevOps, Customer Success, Enablement) contracted in absolute terms.
- 4.Hiring went quieter: agency-fronted listings rose from 6.0% to 8.0% of GTM roles, a leading signal of thinning internal talent teams.
- 5.AI surfaced in the ad copy: in the three weeks it has been tracked, AI language appeared in 14.4% to 20.5% of GTM roles, concentrated in the very functions being cut.
01 · The shape
The quarter in pictures
Q4 opened hot and cooled fast. ANZ companies were carrying 7,730 active GTM roles in the week ending 12 Apr, the high-water mark of the quarter. Six weeks later, in the week ending 24 May, that had fallen to 4,856, a contraction of about 37%, before a partial recovery into late June.
It's the shape of the ratio more than the headcount. Openings trailed closures in 9 of 12weeks: for most of the quarter the market retired roles faster than it created them. Companies opening fewer roles, that's the bottom line.
02 · The buyer's market
What it costs to build a GTM team in ANZ right now
The $100,000 median is useful for headlines and dangerous for hiring plans. A junior SMB account executive and a senior enterprise one are different jobs at different prices, so a single number is the wrong tool. Below is the full per-role breakdown, segmented junior to senior, base and on-target earnings, the same anchored ranges Pointer publishes on its live salary guides: published ANZ guide anchors blended with live ANZ listings and community submissions. The Pool bars show relative candidate availability at each point in the range. If you need these broken down by sector or revenue range, reach out.
One number frames the section: the market median advertised base held at $100,000 every week of the quarter while hiring volume fell. The breakdown below is what that single median actually contains.
Sales
Business Development Representative
Entry Level
6-12 Months of Experience
Account Executive
SMB
Mid Market / Commercial
Enterprise
Account Manager
Commercial
Business Development Manager
Commercial
Sales Leadership
BDR Manager
Sales Manager
Director of Sales *
General
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Head of Sales / VP Sales *
Head of Sales
VP Sales / CRO
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Account Management
Account Manager
Commercial
Key Accounts
National / Enterprise Accounts
Customer Success
Customer Success Manager
CSM SMB-Mid
Mid-Enterprise Market
Head of Customer Success *
Director
Head of / VP
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Marketing
Marketing Manager
General
Digital Marketing Manager
General
Growth Marketing Manager
General
Product Marketing Manager
General
CRM / Lifecycle Manager
General
Content Marketing Manager
General
Brand Marketing Manager
General
Marketing Director *
General
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Head of Marketing / VP Marketing *
Head of / VP
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
Partnerships
Partnerships Associate / Analyst
General
Partnerships Manager
General
Senior Partnerships Manager
General
Director of Partnerships *
General
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
VP / Head of Partnerships *
General
* There is massive variance here depending on company revenue, funding stage, and team size. These titles are also often inflated, with CROs and VPs of Sales existing at sub $1m ARR companies with tiny teams. Read the range as a guide, not a rule.
03 · By function
Sales held, the operating layer cracked
Every function but two shed roles between its quarter peak and the close, and the cuts were not spread evenly. Sales, the largest, drifted from a peak of 3,436 to 3,068 active roles, a net change of -233, while holding its share of demand at roughly 44 to 47 percent throughout. The contraction was carried by the layer beneath it.
Customer Success fell hardest in absolute terms, down 555 roles from peak to close. Presales lost 260, RevOps 99, Enablement 50. These are the operating and technical functions, and as the AI section shows, they are also the functions advertising hardest for AI fluency.
Two functions grew. Marketing added 55 roles and Account Management 404, though the Account Management gain is partly a measurement effect: the function was split out of Sales in early April, so its share is only cleanly comparable from the week ending 13 April.
| Function | Peak | Trough | Close | Net QoQ | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 3,436 | 2,135 | 3,068 | -233 | $100,000 |
| Marketing | 1,646 | 1,135 | 1,606 | +55 | $95,000 |
| Account Management | 1,057 | 566 | 970 | +404 | $100,000 |
| Customer Success | 824 | 185 | 269 | -555 | $90,000 |
| Partnerships | 315 | 153 | 211 | -71 | $125,000 |
| Presales | 425 | 153 | 165 | -260 | n/a |
| Growth | 155 | 57 | 89 | -66 | n/a |
| RevOps | 176 | 47 | 77 | -99 | n/a |
| Product Marketing | 86 | 20 | 41 | -45 | n/a |
| Enablement | 126 | 28 | 37 | -50 | n/a |
| GTM Engineering | 94 | 6 | 10 | -84 | n/a |
04 · Market signals
Hiring went quieter, and more hidden
One signal worth watching sits underneath the volume. The share of GTM roles posted through recruitment agencies rather than directly rose from 6.0% at the start of the quarter to a peak of 8.7% in mid-June, settling at 8.0%.
Agency share tends to rise when internal talent teams are stretched or cut: companies that would normally hire in-house start using external sourcing. In a quarter where overall GTM hiring contracted, a rising agency share is a quiet tell that the squeeze reached the talent function itself, and may signal a shift to external sourcing that runs broader than GTM alone.
05 · Leaderboard
Most active GTM hirers
These are the thirty companies that posted the most GTM roles directly in Q4, with agency and job-board listings stripped out. The top of the list is enterprise technology: Salesforce, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Datacom led the quarter, a reminder that the largest platforms keep hiring through the cycle.
This is where most GTM jobs were, not where hiring grew fastest. A volume leaderboard rewards scale, so household enterprise names dominate and the fastest-growing smaller employers do not surface here. If you need a narrower cut, say Series A tech startups in Sydney under $5m ARR, we can pull it for you.
- 1Salesforce232
- 2Amazon Web Services (AWS)224
- 3Datacom213
- 4Google169
- 5Amazon158
- 6Commonwealth Bank157
- 7Microsoft148
- 8Southern Cross Austereo142
- 9WPP Media129
- 10Schneider Electric125
- 11Flight Centre125
- 12Telstra123
- 13Stryker119
- 14News Corp Australia112
- 15DuluxGroup111
- 16Team Global Express110
- 17Coca-Cola Europacific Partners102
- 18Agoda99
- 19Optus99
- 20Halter94
- 21Aha!91
- 22Asahi Beverages91
- 23Bunzl Australasia89
- 24Vocus89
- 25Airwallex86
- 26Xero86
- 27Genuine Parts Company84
- 28Eagers Automotive83
- 29NAB83
- 30SAP83
06 · The AI split
Companies want AI most in the roles they are cutting
Across 8,209 active GTM roles, 17.1% mention AI. The average hides the finding. Rank functions by how often they ask for AI and you get almost the exact list of functions that shrank this quarter. Presales leads at 51.3%, Customer Success and Enablement sit near 40.1%. Those are the same functions that contracted hardest: Customer Success ended the quarter down 555 roles, Presales down 260.
The functions that grew ask for AI the least. Account Management, up 404 roles on the quarter, mentions AI in just 10.0% of ads. Front-line Sales, the largest function, sits at 13.4%. The operating and technical layer is being asked to become AI-native at the same time it is being thinned. That is the uncomfortable read: companies are not replacing GTM work with AI wholesale, they are thinning the people most likely to operationalise it.
51.3%
of Presales roles ask for AI fluency, the highest of any GTM function. Presales also shed 260 roles this quarter.
AI mention rate by function
All active GTM roles, n=8,209
AI demand against the quarter's hiring change, ranked by AI mention rate:
| Function | AI mention rate | Q4 net change |
|---|---|---|
| Presales | 51.3% | -260 |
| Enablement | 40.4% | -50 |
| Customer Success | 40.1% | -555 |
| GTM Engineering | 40.0% | -84 |
| Growth | 33.0% | -66 |
| RevOps | 29.3% | -99 |
| Product Marketing | 27.3% | -45 |
| Partnerships | 17.7% | -71 |
| Marketing | 17.4% | +55 |
| Sales | 13.4% | -233 |
| Account Management | 10.0% | +404 |
The AI bar is set in the middle of the org chart. Entry roles ask for AI 13.3% of the time and mid-level 14.2%. It climbs through Senior (26.9%) and Lead (29.8%), then falls back at C-level (15.5%). The expectation lands on the senior individual contributors and team leads who would operationalise AI, not on juniors and not, in the language of the ad, on the executives above them.
AI mention rate by seniority
All active GTM roles
Two honest limits. This counts the language of the ad, not the substance of the role. And inside the weekly index the signal has been tracked for three weeks only, from the methodology change in the week ending 14 June:
AI-adjacent share in the weekly index
W24 to W26
07 · Geography
Sydney pays the premium and owns the AI demand
Sydney is the largest GTM market by a clear margin, 2,650 active roles to Melbourne's 1,602, and the only major city advertising above the national median: $105,000 median base against $100,000 in Melbourne and $100,000 in Perth. It is also where AI demand concentrates, 24.2% of Sydney GTM ads mention AI versus 16.2% in Melbourne and 7.6% in Perth.
The mix shifts with distance from the harbour. Sales is 41.0% of Sydney GTM demand, 45.1% in Melbourne, and climbs to 52.1% in Brisbane, 55.0% in Adelaide and 58.1% in Perth. The smaller capitals are sales towns; marketing and the specialist functions cluster in the two big cities.
$105,000
Sydney median advertised base, the only major capital above the national median and the highest AI demand in the country.
Share of active GTM roles by city
| City | Active GTM | Median base | AI rate | Sales | Marketing | Acct Mgmt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sydney | 2,650 | $105,000 | 24.2% | 41.0% | 24.9% | 13.5% |
| Melbourne | 1,602 | $100,000 | 16.2% | 45.1% | 26.7% | 13.6% |
| Brisbane | 698 | $100,000 | 9.7% | 52.1% | 21.2% | 15.2% |
| Perth | 475 | $100,000 | 7.6% | 58.1% | 13.5% | 16.4% |
| Auckland | 257 | n/a | 19.5% | 35.4% | 25.7% | 24.5% |
| Adelaide | 242 | $95,000 | 6.6% | 55.0% | 19.0% | 16.1% |
Median base is the midpoint of disclosed advertised salary; suppressed where fewer than 30 roles disclosed (Auckland).
08 · Plumbing
Salary transparency, for the record
One number moved that is worth a footnote even if it does not drive a hiring decision. The share of GTM listings disclosing pay more than doubled over the quarter, from 7.0% in early April to 16.1% at the close, after climbing as high as 17.6% mid-quarter.
It is still a minority of roles. Four in five ANZ GTM ads name no salary. But the direction is consistent, and the floor it found near 16 percent suggests disclosure is becoming a habit for the kind of employer that discloses, rather than a one-off.
09 · Forward
Five things Q1 will answer
Five numbers will tell us whether Q4 was a pause or a turn. Each comes with a threshold and what crossing it would mean.
Openings-to-closures ratio
Closures outran openings in 9 of 12 weeks of Q4. Hold the ratio above 1.0 for three straight weeks in Q1 and the contraction is over.
Active GTM roles
Demand peaked at 7,730 and bottomed at 4,856. Cross and hold 7,000 again and the market has fully recovered to its April level. Stay under 5,500 and 2026 is a structurally smaller GTM hiring market than the one Q4 opened with.
The technical and ops layer
Presales, Customer Success, RevOps and Enablement lost a combined 964 roles in Q4. If they stop shrinking, companies have finished re-sizing the AI-operations layer. If they keep falling, the cuts are structural, not cyclical.
AI mention rate
AI now appears in 17.1% of GTM ads. Cross 25 percent and AI fluency is a baseline expectation, not a differentiator. The tell to watch is whether it spreads from the technical layer into front-line Sales.
The $100,000 median
Median advertised base has not moved in thirteen weeks. The first quarter it breaks, up or down, is the quarter pay bands finally reprice.
10 · So what
What to do with this
If you are a CRO or revenue leader
Q4 was a buyer's market in exactly the place you build capability. The least competition is in the technical and operating layer, Presales, RevOps and Customer Success, the functions everyone trimmed. Base bands held at $100,000, so you will not lowball on salary, but you will face little competition for these hires. Account Management is the one function your competitors are still building, so expect to fight for account managers. If you want an AI-operations capability, this is the cheapest it has been to hire one.
If you are a hiring manager
The supply side is in your favour. Roles sit live for about 4.1 days and the shrinking functions have deep candidate pools, so you can afford to be selective. For leadership roles, ignore the title and benchmark on scope: a VP of Sales at a sub $1m ARR startup and one at a scaleup are different jobs at very different prices.
If you are a candidate or operator
The resilient roles this quarter were Account Management and front-line Sales, the two functions still growing. The squeezed roles were the technical and ops layer. AI fluency is now an expectation at senior individual contributor and team-lead level, so if you have it, name it on the CV. And Sydney still pays the premium, $105,000 median base against $100,000 in Melbourne.
Appendix
Methodology and caveats
The Pointer Index counts active GTM job listings across Australia and New Zealand, refreshed daily from LinkedIn, Seek and company career sites. The counting unit is the active listing, not the unique vacancy: a role advertised on two boards counts twice. Each listing is classified by function, role and seniority by a large language model, and only genuine go-to-market roles are kept. Agency-fronted listings are excluded from function and salary analysis and reported separately, in aggregate, as a market signal.
Salary figures blend three sources: published ANZ salary-guide ranges as an anchor, live disclosed salaries from listings weighted by sample, and anonymous community submissions. Where live data is thin the guide anchor dominates; as it grows, live data takes over. Role benchmarks show base and on-target earnings across junior to senior bands rather than a single median. AI-language figures come from a detector that scans the full job description and measure the language of the ad, not the substance of the role.
The tracker turned on in the week ending 5 April 2026, so every high and low refers to the thirteen weeks on hand, not a full calendar history. Cells under 30 disclosed roles are suppressed and 30 to 49 are directional. One methodology change was made during the quarter: in the week ending 14 June the seniority and AI classification was revised, so entry-level, leadership and AI-adjacent share are reported only from that week forward and are not comparable to earlier weeks. If a number is wrong we correct it openly in the next edition and never restate a past one silently.
Caveats for this edition
- ·First quarter-length run: tracker turned on the week ending 5 April 2026, not 1 April. Not a clean calendar quarter.
- ·W24 break (2026-06-08): AI-adjacent, entry-level and leadership shares are null before W24 and comparable only across W24-W26.
- ·AI-adjacent is a three-week reading (W24-W26), not a quarter trend.
- ·Account Management share is null before W16 (2026-04-13) while the split out of Sales rolled out; Sales share held roughly flat all quarter (do not claim Sales gained share).
- ·Median advertised base pins to round-number bands ($100,000 every week); read it as bands holding while volume fell, not pay being static. Always show p25/p75 and n.
- ·W26 (week ending 28 June) active count is inflated by the same-day Sunday ingest; anchor the arc on the openings:closures ratio and the peak/trough, not the W26 endpoint.
- ·Agency-fronted share is measured from listing metadata and reported in aggregate.
- ·AI mention rate by function, seniority and city is a full detector scan of all active GTM descriptions (n=8209), a larger point-in-time sample than the three-week snapshot series; it measures ad language, not role substance.
- ·City median base is the midpoint of disclosed advertised salary; cities with fewer than 30 disclosed roles are suppressed.
Appendix
The index: thirteen readings
| Week ending | Active | Opened | Closed | O:C | Median base | Transp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Apr | 7,547 | 7,547 | 0 | n/a | $100,000 | 7.0% |
| 12 Apr | 7,730 | 5,163 | 4,980 | 1.04 | $100,000 | 10.7% |
| 19 Apr | 7,024 | 4,436 | 5,142 | 0.86 | $100,000 | 12.0% |
| 26 Apr | 6,661 | 4,695 | 5,058 | 0.93 | $100,000 | 12.6% |
| 3 May | 5,524 | 4,524 | 5,661 | 0.80 | $100,000 | 17.6% |
| 10 May | 6,933 | 5,549 | 5,729 | 0.97 | $100,000 | 12.8% |
| 17 May | 6,023 | 5,331 | 6,241 | 0.85 | $100,000 | 12.8% |
| 24 May | 4,856 | 4,093 | 6,470 | 0.63 | $100,000 | 15.4% |
| 31 May | 6,085 | 4,602 | 3,854 | 1.19 | $100,000 | 16.5% |
| 7 June | 6,092 | 4,518 | 5,495 | 0.82 | $100,000 | 16.3% |
| 14 June | 5,053 | 4,213 | 6,333 | 0.67 | $100,000 | 15.9% |
| 21 June | 5,399 | 4,602 | 5,016 | 0.92 | $100,000 | 15.3% |
| 28 June* | 6,543 | 4,911 | 4,515 | 1.09 | $100,000 | 16.1% |
* Week ending 28 June active count is inflated by the same-day Sunday ingest. Anchor the arc on the ratio and the peak/trough.
For press
Citation and republication
All figures may be cited with attribution to The Pointer Index, Q4 FY26 (calendar Q2 2026), Pointer Strategy. Charts may be reproduced with a link back to this page. For the underlying data, a methodology question, or a custom cut, contact Ricky Pearl at Pointer Strategy.
Published by Pointer Strategy · Q4 FY26 · Methodology based on thirteen weekly point-in-time snapshots of live job listings, role-level salary benchmarks blended from scraped listings and community submissions, and agency-listing analysis (aggregate only). Cite with attribution.
Share this report: https://pointerstrategy.com/market-data/trends/q2-2026